• sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 day ago

    Anyone who did not see this coming is an idiot.

    EA is… in a loooot of debt lol. Thats why they needed a buy out.

    • FerrisEuler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      They’ve not had a lot of success in the 2020s except for sports games they obviously pay a lot of money in licensing fees for.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The Sims.

        You do not want to know how many ‘dlc’ there are for your digital dollhouse.

        As well as entire community of enthusiastic corporate boot lickers with a ‘cozy’ aesthetic.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Kind of yes, but actually no.

        We just see that debt now, its explicit.

        EA … was subject to a leveraged buy out, that they sought out. They did this… because they needed cash, now.

        What that means is that their internal financials were an absolute shit show… that they had, up untill that point, basically just legally lied about, hid, downplayed.

        They fluffed up their balances and returns and cashflows in ways that are legal to do, but if you actually do due dilligence, you could read the writing on the wall.

        Its basically the same as any other US company that got bought out / sold itself to private equity in the last 10 or 15 years.

        Difference is, EA is so huge, it had to be bought out by essentially a sovereign wealth fund.

    • auzy1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 day ago

      It takes a lot of money to make the same games for 25 years straight, change the front logo, the names of the players, make tiny tweaks and market it.

      Maybe they need to start releasing Sims 2025, 2026, etc.

      • Johanno@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        The problem is that they actually needed that much money for such mediocre games. They poured money into it and still made it an inferior game.

        • auzy1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Sims was actually fun at the time… Until they did all the expansions

          But, I really wish it was black and white. That was the best game

            • auzy1@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              It worked well even without it

              We shouldn’t have to remove the ladder for the pool in the Sims or play with fireworks. Should be able to pick them up and throw them

              • Soggy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Oh I’m not disputing that the game we got was a good one, just that it seems like such an obvious concept for VR. I thought the sequel was disappointing. Focused entirely too much on warfare as the only viable strategy, and I missed the variety of wacky side quests and secrets scattered around the maps.