Meta says safeguards are in place to prevent surreptitious filming, but some UK venues now prohibit them from being worn at all
When Meta used superstar Kylie Jenner to promote its sleek new line of “spy glasses”, the social media company hoped the devices would reach the same broad acceptance that tablets and smartwatches have found before them.
But those plans have hit a snag in the UK, where venues from elite restaurants to popular pub chains have banned the £359 glasses in order to preserve the privacy of customers and staff.
Celebrated restaurateur Jeremy King, owner of London venues including Simpsons in the Strand, Arlington and The Park, said guests should not wear the recording glasses.
He told the Guardian: “I would never knowingly allow any invasion of guest privacy other than with the eyes we were born with.”



How does this work? How reliable is it?
Not very reliable at all since there is a huge second-hand market for removing the LEDs so you can film surreptitiously without being clocked as recording.
It seems like there are people who make good money “fixing” these to disable the LED.
Isn’t the entire POINT of these to record people without their knowledge or consent? If they couldn’t be disabled they wouldn’t be able to sell them.