Why do delusional superstitions deserve respect? And why do they deserve special treatment?
Why is indoctrination of children with these superstitions even allowed?
I am not doing harm, I am not indoctrinating anyone, and I am not discriminating anyone, at least not anymore than Nazism being illegal in many countries discriminate Nazism because that too is considered a harmful belief.
Why would a fake not working battleship be that expensive? And why call it Trump class and reveal the bluff from the get go?
For some reason the west has decided that religious madness should be a freedom for all, and allowed to run wild.
Religion is demonstrably harmful, it is superstition and people building their lives on superstitious practices are bound to make bad decisions that is harmful to themselves and their families and society as a whole.
I wonder when we will see more balance introduced to debates on religious freedom. Yes you have the freedom to believe what you want. But should you also have the freedom to spread demonstrably harmful superstitious beliefs?
This sounds like something you outright made up.
Classical unsolved math problems have rewards.
Mathematics absolutely have peer review:
Neither paper has been peer-reviewed
But that’s not really the point, the point is that yes maybe AI can solve long standing mathematical problems, but they need to be confirmed by REAL mathematicians.
Because AI has been shown to hallucinate and lie when presented with problems they can’t solve.
There are many claims about AI solving hard mathematical problems, but very few that are confirmed. These stories seem to at least to some degree to act as advertising for AI services.
The hard surface is resonant but also easier to clean.
The shape is out of necessity too, it needs to be big enough to sit on, but flushing also needs to be able to funnel the water to flush properly.
If you can figure out a non resonant material that is suitable for the job, you could be very rich very fast.
Yes, scientific articles are expensive.
Doesn’t have to be scientific articles, it can easily be a normal article that state that scientists have confirmed the findings independently.
This is a very common thing for normal media to describe. The second article you linked would most probably have included that if such confirmation existed.
I linked to evidence that mathematicians are using LLMs to find proofs
No you didn’t, the article described a researcher testing the capabilities of AI, nothing in the article was really about math, it was all about the AI, and the whole story reeks of sensationalism.
There is no evidence stated in the first article, and it’s paywalled.
The second article doesn’t show independent confirmation that the alleged proofs are real. Which was exactly what the original criticism was about.
Yes we all know the claims, and you have done nothing but parroting those claims without evidence.
Which is way more possible to link to. But you chose not to?
When the police is part of the mob, that’s how it is.
They say they didn’t even punch back. Still, a plea deal may help them avoid jailtime. But Sanders and Rush aren’t signing.
USA is a cesspool of psychopathy. The country disgust me more every day.
This is not about the mathematical evidence, but the lack of evidence that AI has made mathematical breakthroughs.
The point here is there is rarely any evidence for the claims about AI amazing accomplishments.
The burden of proof is on the one with the claim that AI has made these accomplishments, not on the one being sceptic about it.
deleted by creator
You don’t really need sources, we all know AI tends to hallucinate when presented with a problem they can’t solve.
So far I’ve only read about 1 example of a problem that an AI may have solved. All the rest are without details and are not confirmed in any way.
Remember AI companies are huge on propaganda for their technology, but not so big on admitting the shortcomings.
Edit:
Changed the use of the word evidence to sources, because apparently people misunderstood it.
There is already no need for mathematicians, I can perfectly well make any square root on my calculator. 🤣
Absolutely this. You can also add supercomputers.
AI may help the field move further, but real mathematicians are still needed to evaluate the meaning of such findings.
Absolutely no way.
Even if AI can make mathematical breakthroughs as in evidence of hard to solve problems. We still need mathematicians to clear it as valid.
I imagine AI might actually sharpen the understanding among real mathematicians.
AI didn’t make Chess or Go obsolete either.
Nah that’s going back to 2016 where Trump won the presidential election, so I think the reaction would rather be "So you think Trump will win the election?!
The commission ordered the post and similar messages removed in July, finding that they violated the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, which was expanded in 2023 to prohibit discrimination based on gender identity or expression.
Well done Michigan. 👍
Unfortunately this is not a federal law.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliott-Larsen_Civil_Rights_Act
USA: Hey stop that or we will have to tighten export controls!
Later…
USA: Hey why are you all avoiding us?