Hishiryo

That’s not a valid justifier, they’re just immature because that’s something that anybody should know: not for anything it stills falls into the “sonic pollution” category.

If you don’t respect public spaces and are destroying other people’s peace because you don’t know how to stay silent, then you’re not well-adjusted at all.

Based on their narcissism and egolatry *

That’s why piracy should be a right and a moral and legal obligation

I truly don’t want to try your app… I don’t want all my data leaked or my PC, laptop or phone bricked just because a dumb AI-slop code error.

AI is changing everything… Mostly to bad, that’s the part they keep.

I was referring to “You should do that but you shouldn’t do that” lmao, because I was recognizing that it was a straw man, as I only said it as a joke.

“You should do that but you shouldn’t do that”

Anyways, besides the straw man, the point is that I don’t even consider that to be bad, so I think that saying that it shouldn’t be done — even if merely at the moral-level, but not at the legal level — it’s problematic.

Edit: The straw man is “You should do that but you shouldn’t do that”, that’s simply a joke.

Saying something isn’t good is the same to say that something shouldn’t be done, is a logic equivalence in ethics.

Bro, they sell the DM and Stories on Snapchat to be private “if you decide so”. They do separate private Stories (that supposedly are only shared with people you whitelist) and public Stories, and the same with DM. I know as I have used Snapchat back in 2021, before I got heavily interested in privacy. Maybe some things have changed, but they do still sell, promote and do marketing stuff telling that it is private. Yeah, we do know it’s false, but trust me that marketing can be a powerful force.

You should fucking die if you think like that, or you may be the next fucking Hitler :3

Yeah, I’d call it an invasion of privacy.

But you’re making a false equivalence fallacy anyways. It’s not the same an app that claims to be private and a public site, and even in the latter any joke SHOULD NOT BE prosecuted if it not involves obvious, clear and sound planning of really doing it. You can like or dislike more or less that joke, but it’s still just a joke.

You SHOULD be able to joke about ANYTHING. Who decides what things are permisible? Whoever yoy give the power to do so will then use it arbitrarily to only allow the speech that supports them — that’s how fascism is built, in fact.

I’m a young people that’s a privacy and free speech extremist. Thus, you’re refused.

💀💀💀💀

When I’ve got this ancient…? Why am I mummified?

And I said, the logical structure of that feeling and/or thought is that of a false equivalence. I’m not saying it’s bad to feel like that, but that’s logically incorrect. You’re still comparing something with something distinct, even if it’s at the feeling or thought level.

Maybe I’m the one wrong here trying to rationalize or analyze by logical means something like beliefs or feelings, but I prefer going to that extreme rather to the opposite one.

…even if it’s as something you think or feel, that doesn’t change the fact that the logical structure of that reasoning is a false equivallence…

This

Not ideology, but ethical system. And it’s because is really better than other systems that involve unverifiable or unfalsable propositions.

Red herring, I’ll not say anything else

Exactly, and that’s why I’m saying that she is making a false equivalence. Although I’d say that even if it was just to “fuck someone new”, it still wouldn’t be as bad as she presents it. She can feel that way, and again, that is respectable and she is within her rights to do so, but her way of expressing it is moralizing and judgmental.