My partner has disabilities and so they do not help lift the sofa. But they are a lot better at driving a manual truck than I am, so with a few pillows and adaptations in the driver’s cab that is what they do when someone needs a sofa moved. Some disabilities prevent you from driving the truck too, but it’s important as a group of sofa movers to make sure that everyone has something they can fulfill, even if that means planning the move. That can be incredibly helpful.
- 0 Posts
- 5 Comments
I am also the guy with the truck. But I do not drive 5-speed manual very well. So the truck lives at the house of my friend who is good at driving manual. He’s kind of my Tony, I guess. The truck is indeed a community resource of anyone we are decent friends with.
infinitesunrise@slrpnk.netto
Technology@lemmy.world•Netflix Sued For $105 Million After Hard Drive of Unreleased Nicolas Cage Movie Was Stolen From Its OfficeEnglish
1·7 days agoNetflix will win the suit. A single producer delivering by hand an unencrypted, unprotected DCP is not standard operating procedure in Hollywood. Netflix would have expected the distributor or studio to deliver a case containing a specialized hardened drive, encrypted files unique to that specific copy, meant in some cases to be played only once directly off the drive. A solo producer rolling up with unencrypted, untracked files is wildly negligent by industry standards. Op-Fortitude is just trying to cover their ass with this suit, and it’s probably too late.
Also as someone who has worked in film I found this line from the Netflix exec humorous: “We’ve been working through this with out security teams to no luck. Our piracy teams are on high alert with the breach and will monitor.” Yeah no, what’s been happening is that the security and piracy teams are dealing with a lot of strung out high-demand verbose producers and then turning around and going about their day as usual, good riddance.
infinitesunrise@slrpnk.netto
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Remember kidsEnglish
1·2 months agoI learned the foss equivalents so that I don’t need to.

This is exactly the scenario I am concerned about in regards to the Flock blowback. That the public’s campaign against pervasive surveillance has relied too heavily on Flock as an example that many confuse the problem as being Flock the company and their behavior specifically, rather than pervasive surveillance as a whole and the wider ethical problems it entails. A lot of local activists all over the country are demanding “No Flock!” from their representatives and municipal / county agencies which results in a game of whack a mole when the next surveillance outfit takes Flock’s place, rather than general sustainable anti-surveillance policy.