• 3 Posts
  • 23 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 18th, 2025

help-circle
  • What I’m saying is that also LLMs grew organically. Machine learning developed organically through the years and LLMs are one of the products of such development.

    Machine learning algorithms were absolutely desired and wanted, hundreds of thousands of people worked on developing them. It is a very useful technology. If I may list one very useful development: AlphaFold, for which the 2024 Nobel prize was adjudicated.

    Now, whether LLMs are useful in chemistry and biology: kind of. Coming up with the design of a bacteriophage is not the first use which would come to my mind. Of course LLMs are being tested for their applications in such domains, but results are in general worse than dedicated models. One area in which I see value is the use of agents in orchestrating tools and analyzing results. Not really in producing new things on their own.


  • I’m not arguing that colonization after some time stops being colonization.

    I’m asking why do you believe Ceuta and Melilla are examples of colonization.

    I agree on the right of self determination, for what I know people from Ceuta and Melilla do not want to leave Spain.

    Other parts of Spain do and it is a pity they’re not allowed, even though to be fair the Basque county is pretty much as independent as a region of a country could be and Catalunya has plenty autonomy compared to other communities in Spain.

    I am not talking about Palestine, and I do not want to lead this conversation towards talking about Palestine, because the facts are significantly different. Spain did not conquer a country without any defences just for territorial expansion and genocide. Please, do not introduce irrelevant topics.

    Should indigenous Americans abandon their claims? No, but completely irrelevant to what we’re talking about.


  • I come from a chemistry background. Chemistry is one of the first field in which machine learning was first applied. In fact many of the first algorithms and models have been developed by chemists.

    This has been a gradual adoption throughout the past 50 years.

    How is this different from your description of the internet history? If anything, internet was much faster than that: it took less than 50 years from the first computer to the invention of internet.

    And I’m not even considering the first developments in machine learning, which happened pretty much as soon as computing machines were invented.











  • Scientists don’t often publish when they confirm an article is correct. Knowing a few mathematicians, probably they see no need to do that. They checked the proof, it was ok and that’s it.

    Either way, many of those proofs come with a computer program which checks and confirms the proof is correct.

    I trust that an expert mathematician talking about such things has reviewed a few of those articles and has checked the proof.

    You may not do that; check the proof yourself or pay a mathematician to do it for you.