So the Messiah in Star Wars is supposed “to bring balance to The Force,” but I never understood what it meant.

Star Wars is extremely dualistic–there is a good side and an evil side, a light side and a dark side, the Jedi and the Sith. Every plotline is based around a manichean struggle where only one side can win by annihilating the other.

The “good side”, the Jedi, are explicitly looking a savior to provide “balance” while at the same time imposing all sorts of restrictions on which force powers are allowed and which aren’t. For an order whose messiah is based on Taoist equilibrium, they are positively Christian in their obsession with purity.

I think there is an implicit subtextual critique of the Jedi Order in the prequels that they incompetent, as you might expect from the leaders of a theocracy, but that’s about as far as it goes.

I think the closest we get to ANY real discussion of balance is Luke’s vision on Degobah, where he must see himself as potentially Darth Vader, which can be interpreted as an attempt towards wholeness OR as a warning to not stray into evil.

Can anyone square this circle?

Edit: It’s funny to me that there are more comments than upvotes. People want to share. I love it.

  • warbond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Did everyone share qui gon’s view that Anakin was going to do that? Or was it just him and obi wan?

    • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Quigon was one of the few “prophecy” enthusiasts. The closest to his disposition was arguably his former master, Dooku.

      Obiwan trained Anakin because it’s what Quigon wanted. And nobody could tell him otherwise because he was the first jedi to face a sith in millenia. Even YODA had never fought a sith lord at that point.

      So ya even tho Obiwan’s emotional attachment to quigon was clearly what drove him to defy the council if need be, there wasn’t much they could do because Obiwan was galactically viral at the time.

      • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        A Sith kills a whole squad of Jedi in Acolyte. It’s a century before we hear Duel of the Fates for the first time, but nowhere near “millennia.”

          • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Best lightsaber fight ever in it. More story in one season than all of the sequels combined.

            It’s good Star Wars.

            • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              Also shows how flawed and politically compromised the Jedi were at the time.

              For all it’s (many) flaws, I enjoyed it overall, didn’t think it needed a second season though so no big loss IMO.

              • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                The first several episodes were tough to watch. If I hadn’t been pushed by a few friends to pick it back up, I would have dropped it there.

                I’m so glad that I did come back and finish watching it, because of all the reasons you said and how much it built the larger SW universe.

              • warbond@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                Why lol here? The sequels are a bit hollow, so this seems like it would be true almost no matter what, but not having seen acolyte I can’t draw a fair comparison.