• badgermurphy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    I dont know that many of the vigilante camera removers are going to make the distinction of who makes the camera when they’re standing there in the dark with a band saw, for what that’s worth.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Correct…

      But that’s part of the public outcry.

      A public outcry that focuses on “flock” and “deflocking”.

      So (as the article points out) when the pressure works, the result isn’t no more surveillance.

      The result is they sign a contract with a different company, usually for even more cameras.

      And it’s not much of a logically leap, to assume that once the new company becomes large enough, they will also expand what they do with the cameras just like Flock did.

      • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        True, though I imagine that kind of successful and effective vigilantism feels empowering. In addition, their actions are widely regarded as heroic and lauded, so I think they may continue their efforts regardless of any changes to window dressing on their opponents (the surveillance complex industry). We’ll see! People do seem to be slowly becoming aware of the implications of dragnet surveillance and responding to it negatively in a way that I didn’t expect, so it may continue in that manner. Changing the sign out front of your evil enterprise only throws people off that are not paying attention, and a surprising number of folks seem to be this time.