• melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    So I guess Zuckerberg will be donating a million bucks or so to trump’s “campaign” in the very near future. trump can be bought relatively cheaply.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    When people without billions distribute CP, they get thrown in prison for the rest of their lives.

    I’m thinking if we threw Zuck in prison for the rest of his life, the social media landscape would shift overnight.

  • bcgm3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Let’s see how the party of “protect the kids” responds to this one…

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    567,000,000 ÷ 228,248,000,000 × 365 × 24 = 21.76

    Exactly 21 hours, 45 minutes, 36 seconds of revenue for them. They literally already made that back since the ruling was made and they haven’t even cut a check yet. Cool, I’m sure that’ll totally change things.

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I guess it depends on where in the world that person lives. In the state where I grew up, it’d be more like fining a McDonald’s employee $45, at least in terms of raw income. But if you’re talking about how punitive the measure feels, I think it’s more like a $5 fine. Meta budgets and lives in quarters and years; McDonald’s employees budget and live in hours and weeks.

        Great way to bring it down to earth, though.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Revoke their corporate charter for half a year so they can’t do business in the country. That’ll make em sit up in their seats.

      • 0tan0d@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Why is new mexico the only one holding them to account for the damage against our society?

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    roblox can beat that fine easy. Zuck is never in first place-- even at failing. Always a middle of the pack wannabe.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 day ago

    For fucks sake can we stop doing flat dollar amount fines on megacorps and do percentage of revenue - yes, revenue specifically, not profit, which can be gamed in tons of interesting ways - as punitive measures? Even astronomical 8 or 9 figure fines on companies with market caps in the ballpark of a trillion fucking dollars are effectively brushed off as the cost of doing business, and are ultimately inconsequential and entirely ineffective in terms of serving as a meaningful deterrent to the things they’re being fined for.

    Meta is not going to give a single shit about this. This is a small speed bump, nothing more.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      23 hours ago

      8 and 9 digit fines aren’t astronomical for them (which, I realize, is the point of your comment; I’m just saying this fine is even more a complete nothingburger). Even if you go into 10-figure fines, you’re still in the range where they make it back within the week.

      You’ve got to get into the 11-digit range before it starts to hurt, and the 12-digit range before it starts to send a message.

      But while I agree that we shouldn’t use profits, I’m not sure about revenue. That’s definitely better, but I think we should target the number they’re actively encouraged to pump as high as possible: market capitalization.

      That specifically affects how much they can pull in investment and lending, which can keep them going even if they have zeroes or net-negatives at the bottom of their balance sheet; and it’s the number they’re incentivized to make look as big and beefy as possible, so trying to wiggle out of a fine by making that number smaller might well hurt them more than just paying the fine.

      A lot of companies since Jack Welch oozed his way into executive roles have lived on market cap and vibes for years without turning a profit or making much in revenue at all. Sure, for younger companies, or newly-public ones, they might have a higher annual revenue than their market cap. Maybe we could say “revenue or capitalization, whichever is higher.”

      In the case of Meta, their market cap is $1.5T on $220B of annual revenue. Fining them 15% of their market cap would erase a whole year of revenue; that would send a message.

      For companies like this, punitive fines need to legitimately threaten to put the business under. Especially when it’s not their first offense. Fines totaling 15% of market cap, with the percentage doubling for each offense after the first, seem like they’d be effective in changing behavior; and if they don’t, then the company gets fined into nonexistence after two or three strikes. Problem solved either way.

    • mriormro@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Take all Facebook executives and decimate the group.

      This is the only correct response.

  • arotrios@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    23 hours ago

    So pennies on the dollar then?

    EDIIT: $567 million is .03% of Meta’s current net worth of 1.51 trillion, or 1% of its 2026 revenue of $56 billion.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 day ago

    If we lived in a more just world, Zuck, Musk, Altman and all the rest would be sitting before Congress getting a short break from their interminable stays in prison cells, explaining to the American people the ins and outs of the deliberately harmful products they created.

    It’s nice to see that some of the states and a handful of countries, at least, are doing what the US Government never will and trying to hold these people accountable to some degree.

    If you told me 30 years ago that I’d live to see the day when a CP generator or that a major company would hang its hat on distributing CP for a child rape ring are not only a reality, but one that anyone can access just for paying a subscription, I’m not sure I’d have believed it. But here we are.

    Just another thought for my “This is why a good god doesn’t exist” file.

  • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Oh no, less than an eighth of what they lost on their stupid metaverse project. I’m sure they’ll really feel the sting of this judgement and learn their lesson.

  • zlatko@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wish they could do something like first offence, 10% of your annual revenue for the next 10 years goes to restitution efforts. Second offence, it’s 30% plus the govt. gets to set a CEO and the top management for a year. Thrd strike and the company is shut down and liquidated and the board members or any big stockholders never get to work in that industry again.

      • pipi1234@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        Ding ding ding!

        Ruin the life of thousands of kids, financial slap on your wrist.

        Steal food for feeding your children, you sir ara a threat to humanity. Go to prison for 2 years to reform.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Like…all shareholders?

        Why shouldn’t anyone with an investment in a corporation be culpable for any criminal behavior of the company they’ve invested in? That’s a step or two away from “I didn’t rape and murder that little girl, my LLC did.”

    • Kaul@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Government-appointed CEO sounds great if the government appointing them wasn’t corrupt. There’s no way in hell people would be okay with the Trump admin appointing a new CEO of Facebook.

      • VAK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Zuckerberg would be least okay with it and that’s what matters. There are more important problems regarding Trump. Anyway, could be a court appointed custodian.