Ain’t that some BS
Prosecutors later charged Tunick under a federal statute that makes it unlawful to knowingly destroy or damage property to prevent authorities from seizing it. Tunick has pleaded not guilty.
Security experts also said they had not seen charges brought in this way before.
“With a little planning ahead of time, you can always download the data you need once you get to where you’re going,” said Sandvik.
Zip it with a password. Upload it a couple of places, download it when you get home. Simple as. Anyone can do it.
The thing is, data isn’t just property. It is also speech. The right to remain silent is so fundamental to the legal system that a whole case can be thrown out if you are not reminded of this right while being arrested.
You have a right to remain silent but you don’t have a right to lie. This is super important legally. If you’re asked “what is your device pin” and you say nothing you’re OK, but if you say “my pin is 12345” and that’s actually your duress PIN then you can be in trouble for that.
I was speaking more broadly about the constitutionality of being charged under a destruction of property statute. In a sense, deleting your data is choosing to remain silent.
Everyone is cheering but the case was not thrown out yet. For now we just know this is technically possible which we knew already. Now we will find out if you can do this and not go to jail. I will cheer when this guy walks free.
what was the crime committed? I know they claim the guy “suppressed evidence”, but evidence must point towards a crime that is at least suspected.
It’s the US. The courts don’t have to let you go free just because you’re innocent.
Spoken like a non US citizen who watches too much bullshit on TV.
Haha spoken like an US citizen who knows shit about his own country:
https://hls.harvard.edu/today/why-do-innocent-people-go-to-and-stay-in-prison/
https://www.yahoo.com/news/supreme-court-rules-innocence-isnt-180246605.html?guccounter=1
https://ballotpedia.org/Jones_v._Hendrix
Justice Jackson wrote:
“Apparently, legally innocent or not, Jones must just carry on in prison regardless”




