Ain’t that some BS

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Prosecutors later charged Tunick under a federal statute that makes it unlawful to knowingly destroy or damage property to prevent authorities from seizing it. Tunick has pleaded not guilty.

    Security experts also said they had not seen charges brought in this way before.

    “With a little planning ahead of time, you can always download the data you need once you get to where you’re going,” said Sandvik.

    Zip it with a password. Upload it a couple of places, download it when you get home. Simple as. Anyone can do it.

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      The thing is, data isn’t just property. It is also speech. The right to remain silent is so fundamental to the legal system that a whole case can be thrown out if you are not reminded of this right while being arrested.

      • sculptor0725@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        You have a right to remain silent but you don’t have a right to lie. This is super important legally. If you’re asked “what is your device pin” and you say nothing you’re OK, but if you say “my pin is 12345” and that’s actually your duress PIN then you can be in trouble for that.

        • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          I was speaking more broadly about the constitutionality of being charged under a destruction of property statute. In a sense, deleting your data is choosing to remain silent.