Rather than get rid of ALPR cameras entirely, many cities and towns are switching to Axon, whose cameras can be mounted to an existing streetlamp, helping them blend into their surroundings.
I dont know that many of the vigilante camera removers are going to make the distinction of who makes the camera when they’re standing there in the dark with a band saw, for what that’s worth.
A public outcry that focuses on “flock” and “deflocking”.
So (as the article points out) when the pressure works, the result isn’t no more surveillance.
The result is they sign a contract with a different company, usually for even more cameras.
And it’s not much of a logically leap, to assume that once the new company becomes large enough, they will also expand what they do with the cameras just like Flock did.
True, though I imagine that kind of successful and effective vigilantism feels empowering. In addition, their actions are widely regarded as heroic and lauded, so I think they may continue their efforts regardless of any changes to window dressing on their opponents (the surveillance complex industry). We’ll see! People do seem to be slowly becoming aware of the implications of dragnet surveillance and responding to it negatively in a way that I didn’t expect, so it may continue in that manner. Changing the sign out front of your evil enterprise only throws people off that are not paying attention, and a surprising number of folks seem to be this time.
This is the issue with using a catchy brand name…
The same thing just shows up as a new name and it starts over.
It needs to be deeper than catchy slogans, people need to understand that any widespread surveillance will have the same issues.
I dont know that many of the vigilante camera removers are going to make the distinction of who makes the camera when they’re standing there in the dark with a band saw, for what that’s worth.
Correct…
But that’s part of the public outcry.
A public outcry that focuses on “flock” and “deflocking”.
So (as the article points out) when the pressure works, the result isn’t no more surveillance.
The result is they sign a contract with a different company, usually for even more cameras.
And it’s not much of a logically leap, to assume that once the new company becomes large enough, they will also expand what they do with the cameras just like Flock did.
True, though I imagine that kind of successful and effective vigilantism feels empowering. In addition, their actions are widely regarded as heroic and lauded, so I think they may continue their efforts regardless of any changes to window dressing on their opponents (the surveillance complex industry). We’ll see! People do seem to be slowly becoming aware of the implications of dragnet surveillance and responding to it negatively in a way that I didn’t expect, so it may continue in that manner. Changing the sign out front of your evil enterprise only throws people off that are not paying attention, and a surprising number of folks seem to be this time.